Something needs building
Fix the scope boundary and the architecture decisions before money moves.
See what you getVishal Rajpurohit is co-founder and CTO of ViitorCloud, founder of LaraCopilot, an organizer of Laracon India and a board member of the Laravel Certification Program. He works with founders and leadership teams who need software built, a developer hired, a decision reviewed or a troubled application rescued. He stays on the architecture himself. The ViitorCloud engineering team carries delivery.
No automatic pitch, and no assumption that AI is the answer. If the fit is wrong, you get that answer early.

Every line below is a role with a start date on a public profile, not a claim about how experienced somebody feels.
The throughline: a decision only counts once it has survived production, a real team, and the month after launch. That is why the judgement on offer here stays attached to an engineering company that still ships, rather than becoming an advisory practice that stopped.
Each one starts the same way: clarify the problem, map the system, find the gaps. Each has a page that says exactly what you leave with.
Fix the scope boundary and the architecture decisions before money moves.
See what you getDefine the role, then test for it with a rubric you can run without me.
Read the rubricEstablish what is true, stabilise what is failing, then decide repair or replace.
See week oneOne decision framed, with the evidence that would settle it, and no build attached.
See the memo structureNo. Vishal works on consequential software and business systems. AI is used when it creates a better outcome; conventional software, rules, or a hybrid system may be the more responsible answer.
Both paths are available. Vishal can lead discovery, product definition, architecture, or strategic decisions independently. When implementation is appropriate, delivery can be carried through ViitorCloud under his technical leadership.
Yes. He can work alongside founders, product leaders, CTOs, and engineering teams, providing decisions, architecture, reviews, and coaching while the internal team retains delivery ownership.
Engagements run remote-first, with a fixed overlap window agreed in the first week and every decision written down rather than held in a call. What matters is not the number of shared hours but whether a decision can be made while you sleep and still be one you would have made yourself, which is what the written record is for. Travel for a workshop or a kickoff is arranged when the work genuinely needs a room.
Begin with the business problem. A short fit conversation determines whether the next useful step is a focused sprint, a blueprint, delivery, advisory support, or no engagement at all.
Not a brief, not a stack preference. The thing that is not working, or the thing that has to exist. You will know inside one conversation whether this is a fit.